Is there a way to check all my upvotes?
Not via lemmy web interface AFAIK.
I found a meme i like earlier and upvoted it but now i cant find it.
There’s an option in settings that toggles displaying “seen” (interacted with) posts.
Is there a way to check all my upvotes?
Not via lemmy web interface AFAIK.
I found a meme i like earlier and upvoted it but now i cant find it.
There’s an option in settings that toggles displaying “seen” (interacted with) posts.
Clicking on the extension in the browser bar shows menu that can be used to access/create rules, but I’m using Firefox.
Nice.
How is this not a solved problem?
Tradeoffs I’d imagine. Lemmy devs need to prioritize between lots of things that absolutely need to be addressed first (like the recent vulnerabilities), and as a result relatively “minor” issues like this gets stuck on the sidelines. In addition to that, “beauty is in the eye of beholder”, so spending development time on this stuff when it might not even be acceptable to people is… well, wasteful.
That being said, the code is open source, so anyone can help and contribute improvements/fixes.
Am I the only person who cares about seeing the image at a larger resolution?
Definitely not. I didn’t quite realize just how much of a difference this would make, but now that I’ve added it to CSS overrides it does make a huge difference. Thanks for pointing it out.
This will allow maximum expansion, but will somewhat break display of the sidebar:
.col-lg-9, .col-md-8 {
width: unset;
}
.container-lg, .container-md, .container-sm, .container {
max-width: unset;
}
.offset-sm-3 {
margin-left: unset;
}
I’ve only tested with a few [email protected] posts, and couldn’t quickly find whether this would affect images in comments.
You could add .img-expanded { max-height: unset; }
as a rule for your lemmy instance in the Stylus addon for browser. This will remove the height limiter for images.
(…) cops have yet to ID a suspect.
combined with
Tests later concluded that the digit belonged to a “living human being” who authorities contacted and was “given full medical support,” the source said.
seems to mean that the sender of the finger, and the person to whom the finger belonged to are 2 separate people.
How is this malicious?
Just disable JavaScript on that page, it’s perfectly readable this way.
They should have given you the actual data, not the permalinks to the data. If you’re in a jurisdiction that requires by law that they need to make your data available, then they’re in violation of that. Consider taking legal action.
As for saving the data, that’s mostly trivial for anyone who knows how to write simple scrapping code. But again, this shouldn’t be needed, as the data itself should have been provided, not links.
What’s happening here, reworded:
The thing is, there’s nothing stopping you from having faith. But do keep in mind that you want to have faith in something that is not shitty.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falun_Gong
this one seems nice. Promotes meditation, physical exercise, as well as peaceful civil involvement in society helping others and doing good, which will help you reach spiritual enlightenment.So while I personally like and prefer having a yawning void where some other people have faith,
I generally recommend this religion to people who prefer having faith. If this one isn’t to your liking,perhaps research what other non-shitty options are there.And as a general pro tip when going with the faith option: please, no fanaticism.
Edit: I’ve read some more on this, and this religion has some shitty postulations too. Well, keep looking out.