Yeah 7000-series Ryzen benefits from the avx512 code paths in ffmpeg. I’ve benchmarked a 5900x vs a 7900x specifically for software H.265 decoding and there was a sizeable difference.
Yeah 7000-series Ryzen benefits from the avx512 code paths in ffmpeg. I’ve benchmarked a 5900x vs a 7900x specifically for software H.265 decoding and there was a sizeable difference.
Looks like he just threw up
For example, maybe branching is something you’d like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?
As somehow living in that region of Sweden, that was my first thought!
Forskarna räddar världen med spiddekauga!
I think if they just filled the alt= attribute with the emoji this would copy fine.
Wow, I have TMJ but didn’t know it’s called that. Basically, the jaw joint clicks when eating certain foods. And I have bruxism and occasional tinnitus. Didn’t know the connection, thanks for clearing it up!
What they say for horses is that if you’re going to walk behind one, stay just behind it. That way if it does decide to kick you, the legs won’t be able to build up momentum and will be mostly vertical before hitting you. Under no circumstance walk 1-2m behind it, you can die if it hits you in the head.
Apply at your own risk to cows.
Looks like real hands but not her hands
In Swedish we spell it text.
European here, I suggest Bosch or Electrolux, if that’s available in your part of the world.
Jeans in the dryer? They’ll definitely shrink that way.
I think you commented on the wrong post Edit: nevermind, these are spam links that they bypass the spam filter by starting with some random text.
What a time to be a predator
separate processor with hundreds of cores
Well, graphics rendering is very suited for parallelism. That’s why GPUs were invented.
Most other tasks are not. Most of the cores in a 128-core JPU would end up being unused. Also why JPU? It’s not like it’s significantly different from a normal CPU task.
At least in Sweden, decimeter and deciliter are very commonly used. They are rather convenient units of measurement.
This is great, but the context is that this is for specific inner loops, and it is compared to the C version of that specific inner loop. Typically what was used before this on a computer with avx512 was the avx2 version of the inner loop, and the speedup compared to that version appears to be up to 60%: https://x.com/FFmpeg/status/1852542388851601913 . Then as not a specific inner loop isn’t run all the time, the speedup is probably much less than 60%. This is still sizeable, but the actual speedup in practice with this implementation is far far from 94x.