“Bolsheviks aren’t leftists” is an argument, bud. And what you’re supposed to do, if you want to respond, is address the argument, not something else that you find easier to attack
Red fascism playbook: when there’s nothing bad to accuse leftists of, make up some future offense
Nothing about that changes the fact that Bolsheviks aren’t leftists. You guys have never seen an argument that you didn’t dodge with a red herring or straw man.
Red fascists: claim to be leftists, behave like Nazis. Leftists: “Fuck off, Nazis.” Red fascists: :surprised pikachu:
I’ve seen them actively celebrate that they don’t suffer from “Trump derangement syndrome” like liberals (supposedly) do. The longer you watch them, the more pro-fascism you see slip through
Who are these people who have so many choices in friends that they can afford to vet them?
Is Aramaic word that references dying words of Jesus
No, stating that a popular revolt against a corrupt leader is the result of our actions is denying their agency
How much do you bet?
Incorrect on all counts!
Ok, so you’re a bad person, that’s all
russia is the only one preventing those
There’s no proxy war. You’re dehumanizing Ukrainians by denying their agency
Ad hominem fallacy
Hawai’i was illegally annexed and the indigenous people never agreed to joining the US.
BBC article covering the basic facts, with something of a pro-US slant Wikipedia’s summary of the issue, with links to more references
To add to what others have said, Signal’s server code is open source, but they took the anti-spam module closed source last year
Hawai’i isn’t legally part of the US; the federal judge’s opinion has no bearing there.
That’s a ridiculous idea. If I buy a computer with an OS that has an encryption key to protect the hard drive, and later I need that key to remove my data to another system, I have an entirely reasonable expectation that I’m allowed to do so, regardless of how much the computer manufacturer doesn’t want me to.