The Palestinian Authority somehow took a more extreme position than both Hamas and the Israeli police.
The facts are that helicopters were used to indiscriminately target people in the kill zone and likely killed Israeli civilians, but the helicopters were by no means the only cause of casualties in Re’im. To claim that helicopters killed all 364 people doesn’t pass the sniff test.
So… You haven’t read the article then, I take it?
Do you read articles, or only headlines?
Ad hominem attacks, wonderful
MBFC, well-known in journalism circles for being an “armchair academic” and for reliance on the very subjective assessments they’re trying to suss out.
Removed by mod
What are the credentials of MBFC? A physiology degree on behalf of Dave Van Zandt and…?
MBFC doesn’t even have a methodology for scoring. There’s no formula and it’s entirely a subjective grading.
Their scores are worse than useless
Their methodology is literally “this is the number I feel like they deserve”
MBFC again and again. Do we know anything about MBFC that isn’t published on the MBFC site? Nobody knows who Dave Van Zandt is. His only credentials are: he’s registered as non-affiliated, he’s interested in politics, he has a physiology degree and works in healthcare, he has a “keen eye,” he’s been “doing this for a long time,” and he has a website.
His methodology is entirely subjective and his primary source of credibility is that people like you use his site.
Their methodology is arbitrary to the point of being incoherent.
Now, maybe if you could find this guy’s credentials it might give him a bit more credence. Oh, that’s right. You can’t.
Have you looked at their methodology? It wouldn’t pass a basic university-level writing course.
It’s really not. MBFC is run by a single guy. It’s methodology is basically worthless. It’s basically one dude’s opinion on what news sources he likes to read.
What do we know about that guy? Not much. He happens to share the same name as a very prominent lawyer/professor, which makes finding details about him very challenging.
Sri Lanka: stuck between a Chinese-owned and operated port and an India-owned and operated port.
Y’know, it would be great if it could be a Sri Lankan-owned and operated port… Adani Group didn’t even give them a choice in that matter.
Guess it’s time for Argentina to issue a new currency.
Sovereignty over monetary policy is extremely valuable and dollarization will simply trade one problem for many others.
I mean, anyone who was convinced otherwise was delusional. We’ve always known that methane has a substantially higher short-term impact on GHG emissions than carbon dioxide. We’ve also known for years now that natural gas is notorious for leaking obscene amounts of methane (even compared to coal mining per unit energy). That hasn’t stopped us from tapping and consuming more gas: in fact, total US fossil fuel electricity production has increased by 40% over the plateau in the 1970s-2000s.
In the short-term, we are incredibly, incredibly fucked. Eventually, methane decays and whatnot, but that might be too little, too late.
Have you tried living with the US?
The US doesn’t even hide it. They tear apart Canadian industries (see: Bombardier), they rip up trade agreements (see: NAFTA), they fund right-wing extremists in Canada (see: Freedom convoy), they dump millions of dollars into “independent Canadian think tanks” (see: MLI and the Fraser Institute), they bribe Canadian officials with cushy jobs after public service (see: Stephen Harper and the IDU), and they’re overall a massive contributor to the decline of Canada as an independent nation with independent policy. Oh, and they constantly push for free trade that seeks to displace Canadian corporations with American ones so that they can offshore all the profits.
Low capital cost for high operating cost. Where have I seen this before?
O&G really is the key decider in US foreign policy, huh?