It’s sad that this is considered malicious at all. Seriously, either working from home is a risk for your company or it isn’t, there’s nothing in between.
It’s sad that this is considered malicious at all. Seriously, either working from home is a risk for your company or it isn’t, there’s nothing in between.
I mean, I’ve travelled a bit and it is tiring. For me. It might not be for you, but really, your experience is not other people’s experience.
I wouldn’t really call chronic back pain a preconceived anxiety, but you do you.
Just accept that your lifestyle isn’t good for everyone. You found something that works well for you, congrats! Doesn’t mean you found some huge secret on how to make everyone’s life better.
Both, tbh. I’m not a workaholic, but I really like my work, so I’d get bored if I didn’t work. And I have a pretty sweet work-life balance.
Travelling I like of course, but not too often, I have a really expensive mattress to help alleviate my chronic back pain and sleeping somewhere else is not a pleasant experience. So doing it once in a while is fine, doing it regularly would suck.
And last but not least, lately I like my peace and quiet, constant travelling would not go well with that.
So any advice on how to do it? Sounds intriguing. Not that I’d want to have that lifestyle, but still curious.
What the hell is the fella smoking if he thinks Apple would ever let others use their on-device LLM? Like, the company that deems it too dangerous if apps could change a wallpaper?
Hey, I love my kernel processes! Especially my LLM kernel processes.
Until someone makes a frontend for syncthing that’s significantly dumbed down, it’s not elitist.
That’s actually not that bad. People who like to post disinformation don’t restrict themselves to political subs.
With your mindset we’d still be in the stone age.
You know there are already stone tools, right?
Are we? Still too poor to own stuff because generations before us are hoarding riches like they could take them to the grave.
Just give him the traffic. Traffic without actually believing the stuff there is just costs him money and gives him nothing.
That’s very different, they want you to either pay or not have access. This would be you still having access, but being paid for giving them data voluntarily.
That’s perfectly legal and employed across many European business entities.
For my use case Revolut mostly replaced it.
They’ll give you $2 or something like that if you give them consent. You would be surprised how well that works.
And it feels wrong for this comic.
But a decade from now, there will be AI trained on data that will no longer exist. And many websites that GPT trained on probably don’t exist anymore.
Thanks for explaining a joke that has been running around forever.
Not really, I usually avoid time travel stuff because they usually fuck up the logic and I can see way too many inconsistencies.
1.46 billions of iOS users as of 2023. And 100 million MacOS users.