I got his meaning. Isn’t that the purpose of language, in the end?
I got his meaning. Isn’t that the purpose of language, in the end?
What browser are you using?
Even better, so it mutates into superior data!
And farts.
I was with you until you did potatoes dirty.
Fun fact: Brussel sprouts taste better now because the bitterness was intentionally selectively bred out of them in the '90s. They were, apparently, only bitter for a period of time because the ones that were easiest to mechanically harvest were bitter. Pre-mechanical harvesting, less bitter varieties were more popular.
https://www.mentalfloss.com/posts/do-brussels-sprouts-taste-better-now-yes-here-s-why-01ghed9q8dr8
ADL vice, ADL vice, every morning hypocrisy.
This seems to be a general theme. Those arguing loudest for better privacy are really saying “only we should be allowed to invade your privacy”. See: Google, Apple, the EU
Yeah, but $5m sounds kind of low. That’ll buy, what, 10 homes?
They don’t exist. Believe me, since I finally put my old LG V20 out to pasture, I’ve been waiting. The closest thing is the Fairphone, but it doesn’t support all US LTE bands.
It’s too bad Android didn’t lean more into it’s relative freedom. Instead, almost all Android manufacturers have followed Apple’s lead closely. I have to believe there’d be a sizeable market for a flagship Android phone with, say, a removable battery, headphone jack, SD card slot, and an easily unlocked bootloader.
Do you donate to charities?
I agree with you strongly. We have the technology, it’s just pointed at the wrong crowd. The eyes of the surveillance state should be on the rich and powerful, not the masses. The price of power should be the loss of privacy.
I don’t know if that’ll help. Most cars are internet-connected nowadays. They can just stream the data back home.
My (often unpopular) opinion is: none. Our government agencies should exert their efforts improving privacy and security rather than subverting it. We should be a nation of white hat hackers.
Rural western Virginia has fiber internet to your home in a lot of places.
For example: https://www.alleghanyhighlandsbroadband.com/
Is the implication that the US did not prohibit growing poppies for opium?
Edit: Apparently, this is true per the article OP linked below.
It’s not just about it being open source, it’s about the mentality of the people running it.
It’s about both. Because, if it isn’t open source, there is no wayit is substantially more difficult to verify that the people running it aren’t lying.
How well do they self-clean? How often do you need to clean it manually?