US concerned NASA will be overtaken by China’s space program::undefined

  • TakiMinase@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Export all your technology and jobs to cheaper labour to make more profit. Now you will slowly become bankrupt, as no one can afford the enshitification products and services.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    One can only hope.

    The last time that happened, we explored the moon and developed the space shuttle program. We got microchips and memory foam.

    Ideological rivals encourage congress throwing money into big science. Apollo returned $14 on the dollar. It’s a good investment.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m sure throwing more money and contracts at Musk and SpaceX is going to help solve the problem any day now. /s

  • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    We all live on this rock. Floating through space.

    Anyone who doesn’t want to spend more time looking out is someone with something in their closet you don’t want to look in.

    Ad Astra per Aspera

      • Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        theythey have the qote mixed up its Ad Astra Per Aspare, To the stars through dificalties… you see it everywhere in Kansas

      • orrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        well, I think he meant: Per aspera ad astra

        just remember that almost all older languages had fewer nouns and verbs, so “thorns” here is referring to difficulty and obstruction

        so more meaningfully translated, this old Latin saying is closer to “through great treachery is the path to the stars”

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I mean it’s not that hard to recognize “thorns” meaning difficulty and obstruction.

          But as I’m saying this, I remember that younger generations didn’t spend time outside as kids. So they may never have pushed through a thicket of thorns.

          Eventually, we’ll have people who’ve lived their entire lives in zero-G, and they won’t have an intuitive understanding of the feelings implied by the phrase “stand up for oneself”. They won’t understand the state of motivation versus fatigue implied by “holding one’s chin up”, that the posture of one’s body was a function of the interplay between gravity and dopamine.

        • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ok so the Starfleet quote is “Ad Astra per Aspera”. Should it be Per Aspera ad Astra? Asking for Latin grammar lessons

  • veee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    If they were truly concerned, they’d start giving it the funding it deserves.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      They’ve tried everything except actually funding NASA, and they’re all outta ideas.

      NOTE: China WILL overtake NASA, the same way they are dominating the renewable energy sector — because they invest heavily in science, and they do it early. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand this shit.

        • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Unfortunately that company is the best hope we have to stay ahead. With their low cost they can monopolize the worldwide launch market(except Russia and China). So that funding, strategically, must continue.

          What should also happen is funding spacex competitors, so we stay on the bleeding edge.

    • demesisx@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I came here to say exactly this.

      Perhaps a space race with China would rekindle the motivation for our money grubbing demagogues to actually fund it.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, it won’t. They’ll just relocate to China, or maybe a super yacht out in international waters. They’ll continue milking every last cent out of the US until it’s a dead dried up husk of a nation and then they’ll just move to the next one. Their supporters are too stupid to realize where the end of the path they’ve been told to walk is going to take them, and they’d rather blame anyone else but themselves for all the problems they face. So no, a space race with China won’t fix shit.

        • demesisx@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Judging by the state of the US, you’re much more likely to be right than I am, you cynical bastard!

          😂

    • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      This is the power of not funding your space program and actively destroying your own educational system, which is where things like engineers and scientists come from in the first place.

    • irmoz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Are you trying to say NASA hires “too many women, LGBTs and brown people”, and that this is holding them back?

      Is there something about straight, white cis males that makes them better at rocket science?

      • pekos@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I don’t believe in racial science and “superiority”, however I refer to hiring based on only merit and not just for the sake of fulfilling a diversity quota. The tech industry has suffered enough because of this.

  • aew360@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is a good thing. Competition with the USSR made NASA what it is.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Gee whiz, maybe we should have been properly funding our space program all of these years instead of wasting it on making the military industrial complex filthy fucking rich and the world less secure overall?

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      To be fair, it’s not as if those things are mutually-exclusive. For example, you know how the Hubble Space Telescope is this extremely unique and nigh-irreplaceable scientific instrument that cost a pretty big fraction of NASA’s entire budget?

      Well, it turns out we actually have dozens of the damn things; it’s just that we couldn’t be bothered to actually point more than one of them away from Earth instead of towards it.

      Hell, a decade ago the National Reconnaissance Office gave NASA a couple for free 'cause they just had 'em lying around, but (as far as I know) NASA hasn’t managed to scrounge up enough money from the couch cushions to spruce 'em up and launch 'em yet.

      • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        They certainly don’t have to be, but there is a well established pattern of the US government getting waaay too chummy with corporations to the point that it can undermine what’s best for the people in pursuit of corporate interests.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      People behind the scenes are siphoning NASA space research money and turning it into space profit instead. The growth of private space companies starting in the US is no coincidence. Blame oligarchs for steering the country into a dead end.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Hate on spacex and its competitors as much as you want, im not saying you dont have cause.

        But defunding NASA caused this. Those billionaires looked and said holy shit, the entire nasa budget is only that much? And they arent building rockets anymore? I can literally fund my own space program? Ide be crazy not to

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Especially stupid considering last time they gave the space program appropriate funding, it led to a lot of advancements that the military industrial complex could use.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        You make it sound like the military advancements were an unexpected byproduct, as opposed to the real goal.

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          The goal was optics. Kennedy didn’t know what advances would result from Apollo. He wanted to show that the US was better at science and technology than Russia.

          • Windex007@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            The science of putting a ballistic payload anywhere, including heaven.

            The space race was awesome because it let the two countries measure their dicks (specifically their military dicks) without actually obliterating the planet.

            The “for all mankind” angle was a great way to frame things for the population of Earth, for sure. But just like mobile chemical WMD labs in Iraq, sometimes the given justification and actual justification are two different things.

            Don’t get me wrong, there absolutely were beneficial optics. Something doesn’t have to just be for one thing. But it was always primarily about practical demonstration of weapons capacity under the facade of human exploration.

            • RedFox@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              I don’t disagree, but has anyone found corroborating evidence or documentation, past speculation and reasonable assumption?

              • RedFox@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                Ha, I was actually taking about the space program, but same for the invasion. Although, I feel like more people have come forward about the invasion being BS than early space program stuff.

              • Windex007@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                No, I don’t think anyone has definitely proven that George W Bush and Colin Powell KNEW that the WMD claims in Iraq were bullshit when they were presenting them as the primary justification for the war.

                It’s just the nature of the beast.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Anyone concerned that the US will be “overtaken” by anything coming out of China right now needs to go read about what’s been happening in China for the last 5 years.

    • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you look at the Artemis mission and think starship is the weakest part of the plan, you are simply not being objective.

    • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      At least for ISS, the choice is either Musk or Putin.

      I don’t know which one is worse, especially considering Musk is aiding Putin via Starlink in Ukraine.

      Ukraine claims Russian forces using Musk’s Starlink in occupied areas

      But as someone who works in the industry, it is a bleak outlook. NASA absolutely needs more funding for its human spaceflight exploration, Earth Science, robotic exploration, and astronomy/astrophysics.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      SpaceX has launched more successful missions this year than every other space agency put together.

      Fuck Musk and all that, but if you’re posting this bullshit, you have Musk derangement syndrome.

    • gaifux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      NASA is a fraud. Musk is just the latest goofy face of govt black projects. Keyfabe

    • Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      They are likely going to fund it less and give more and more of its mission over to space force and private companies is my guess

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        That would also work.

        The only thing that won’t work for space is the thing we’re doing now:

        • Maintaining a vice-like government control
        • Using that government authority to choose not to move forward

        Progress only stops under a narrow set of conditions that need to be actively implemented by the government. Progress is actually natural, and progress stopping requires enormous centralized effort to interfere with people getting things done.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Theoretically private programs would be an increased cost over a NASA only program since private companies want a profit margin.

            But Congress being what it is tends to require NASA programs to create jobs in a lot of different voting districts across the country which leads to an insane amount of inefficiencies.

            We can’t have nice things because of pork barrel politics.

            • Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Private Companies however have no insintive to actualy innovate, if you look at them they are all taking decades old NASA and USSR Space program tech and resuing it … and callling it innovation

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      If we fold it into the space force and say it’s for targeting woke weirdos…we’ll get a billion dollars through congress by tomorrow

        • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Intelligence that doesn’t come from jeebus?! They’ll burn that ark before it leaves the ground

          Search for god or his patio or whatever…now you’ve got Midwest money

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            “Search for extraterrestrial divine intelligence” or “a strategy to get closer to God through space colonization”, say, a Stanford torus in some L point (that’s so expensive that it ain’t gonna happen, but they’ll also be very excited, I think).

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        We could just say the “anti-woke” part and not even bother with the space force part and that would probably work.

        The woke boogieman is the biggest thing to scare them in years.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          -1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The woke boogeyman scares us because it, itself, is a set of false threats that are distracting us from real threats.

          Like, we’re worried about war, a shifting global power structure, the degradation of systems of detente that keep the worst in humanity from emerging, and the woke crowd wants us to treat the feelings of exclusion of trans people as the most important threat on the board.

          The woke movement is a boogeyman movement, and that’s why we treat it as dangerous. The woke movement is a push to get new boogeymen added to our threat list and moved to top priority over things we know will actually kill us.

          And thing that really, really scares us, is that the system that has proven to be the salve for the ills of massive unleashed violence, the system we call free market economics, is being targeted by the woke crowd because they refuse to read the history of the things they’re proposing. They’re all like “we don’t want people to suffer so let’s abolish private property”. That’s like saying “we don’t want people to drown, and people tend to drown when they’re near boats, so let’s destroy this boat we’re all in, to prevent drowning!”

          It’s terrifying to us because there are serious things to be afraid of, and the woke movement is asking us to ignore or even embrace those things.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            There is no “woke movement.” That’s exactly why you’re scared of a boogieman. They don’t exist either.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Their station has like three modules (with plans to add 3 more) and capacity for 3 people. The ISS has at least 16 modules (maybe over 30 depending on what you count as a module) and capacity for over a dozen people.

      Like many things from authoritarian countries, it looks nice but isn’t even close in terms of capabilities.

      • Filthmontane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Authoritarianism is not equal to capabilities. In fact, the Soviet space program was significantly more capable for a very long time