1. over time this might affect our collective consciousness in regards to the purpose & function of the eggplant; and

  2. can we please just get a straightforward penis emoji already?? Half the human population has a penis attached to their bodies anyway, why are we still so prude about incorporating actual penises into mainstream vernacular & daily life?

addendum:

  • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    It doesn’t help that social media censorship is leading to a more constrained language, if anything. Not only profanities are either censored or shadowbanned by some platform algorithms, there’s also general use words for sensitive topics such as suicide, abortion and the like.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hey as long as we ignore these problems they’ll simply evaporate. Er sorry, my bad. They’ll unexist.

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    We can’t even have a gun or a middle finger emoji. I doubt we’re getting a penis one anytime soon.

  • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    over time this might affect our collective consciousness in regards to the purpose & function of the eggplant

    I think that that’s already happening. Personally, when I see an eggplant, I automatically think of penises, and it makes me a bit uncomfortable.

    As a bonus, here are some ancient Egyptian dick hieroglyphs: 𓂸 𓂺 𓂹

    • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Thank you for the copy/pastable hieroglyphics 𓂸 𓂺 𓂹

      I see the second one is spewing liquid, but what is the third one doing with that hook thing?

    • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Personally, when I see an eggplant, I automatically think of penises,

      Same! 😆 But I wouldn’t say I feel uncomfortable about it, I feel amused and I giggle. One time I’m over at my ex-husband’s house visiting my kids and his new wife said they have a thriving garden in the backyard and she offered me this ginormous eggplant (I mean it was COMICALLY huge) and I looked at it appreciatively for a moment then burst out laughing and honestly I had no use for an eggplant whatsoever cuz I don’t cook and I’m not going to just eat the thing, I declined the offer but it was so funny. I keep wondering what my ex-husband’s new wife thought about me bursting out laughing at an innocent eggplant offering. I know she’s not so innocent that she would be naive to the double entendre, my ex husband has told me her kinks in the bedroom and that’s fine LOL

      (Edit: spelled entendre the way I think it’s supposed to be spelled instead of my “smart” phone consistently spelling it in a way that looks wrong to me.

      • Kumabear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        As a child of divorced parents I am impressed with the seemingly mature working relationship you and your ex husband have maintained.

        • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ah! that may appear to be the case from this little anecdote I just shared, but believe me there is a lot of drama, for example the stepmom told me next time she’ll let me visit them is June 2025 for my daughter’s high school graduation🤦‍♀️ There’s SOOOO much drama and that woman is extremely controlling, she puts on a pleasant facade but she is a domineering, authoritative, control freak, and we all just let it slide because nobody wants any drama. She’s the one that creates all the drama. So we simply let her do that because we are not interested in drama.

  • HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Would the black version of the penis emoji be longer than the others? Would it be an erect or a flaccid penis? Why not both? Or better even, a full range of male excitement. The applications are endless!

    (I’m joking of course but it does demonstrate the silly questions you would have to answer if you were to actually implement this)

  • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    You should probably transcribe the contents of your addendum photo for the visually impaired so their screen readers can read it

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Here’s an oddity … people use 🍆 “eggplant” for penis, and 🍑 “peach” for butt, but there doesn’t seem to be a general consensus on which emoji to use for vulva. Some options include:

    • Flowers such as 🌷 “tulip” or 🌹 “rose”
    • 🐚 “spiral shell”; compare South American Spanish concha
    • 🦪 “oyster”; which has a visible pearl (i.e. clitoris) on many systems
    • Food items whose names are used as slang for vulva, such as 🍯 “honey pot” or 🌮 “taco”
    • 👛 “purse”; compare the origin of the word “pussy” in English
    • Any of the various cat emoji, also for “pussy”

    (Really there are plenty of other options for penis as well, such as 🌽 “ear of corn” or 🕹 “joystick”, but folks seem to have settled on the eggplant.)

  • KombatWombat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Emojis are used very widely, including places meant specifically for young kids. These places would already censor words, but requiring emoji censorship as well is adding complexity to a problem that is already difficult to handle. Companies not on the ball with the release of sexual organ emojis would let kids see that until it’s added to their filter list. Kids wouldn’t know what it means, but it can lead to them googling for context or encourage a conversation with the predator using it if they ask about it.

    Honestly, I just don’t think it’s worth the headache. Eggplants and peaches and cats are already pretty easy to understand in context, and if you need more than the emojis we already have, we do have our old fashioned words.

    • watersnipje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I know this is a cultural thing, but it still baffles me sometimes. In countries where censoring any (even non-sexual) nudity for children is a thing, are people pretending that children don’t have genitalia? Why would children be confused about seeing genitals, or “not know what it means”? It’s not like they only grow in at puberty, we’re born with all our parts attached.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Can we please stop these idiotic calls to de-profanify all things and pretend everything’s for every situation.

    Are you aware we invented clothing super super super early on, and that humans tend to wear loincloths when there’s no other need for clothing?

    Stop trying to greenfield rewrite culture. It’s like trying to tear down a bridge you’re standing on.

    • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t get this, it should be enough to choose for yourself to use or not use profanity, but somehow it isn’t. Why?

      • okamiueru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        There is no good answer to that question. Too many don’t understand the importance of context/intention, and unfortunately they are also the same ones that get easily offended on behalf of everyone else. Part of the “but, the discussion should be more about meeee, and my feelings, and how offended I am”-mindset.

        Which is why “kid cosplaying as early days MJ” manages to offend anyone. Why you cannot watch the Community episode on D&D. Why they likely wouldn’t dare make Tropic Thunder today. Why many git-branches are renamed to main, etc, ad nauseum.

        That said. Even though unicode group could (and IMO should) define all things useful, I don’t see why “male-genitals-flaccid” couldn’t be specified. Doesn’t require any application level visual implementation. But those that do, and have good reason to, can use a specification, rather than make up their own.

  • Potatisen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    For nr 2, in America, where most of this stuff comes from, it’s super taboo with sex and anatomy. Violence, theft and other things are ok tho… 🍆

    • rar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Seeing how the gun emoji was rebranded into a water gun, I won’t be surprised if same process is attempted anywhere in the world.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Specifically the Unicode Consortium is the body that adopts new emoji. It is incorporated out of California.

      • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        yeah I remember reading some long-winded detailed article about how some guy came up with an idea for an emoji and the long process leading up to being invited to silicon Valley to present his idea at this consortium and his delight after jumping through all the hoops for his emoji idea to be finally accepted

  • rar@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I always thought incorporating a drawing into legit character encoding is not a good idea.

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Unicode has ~150k characters, many of which are not supported by any fonts on most people’s computers. They still have space in the encoding system for another 900k. They have the space.

      For comparison, the Basic Multilingual Plane in Unicode (the most “useful” part with most modern languages) only contains 65k characters and ASCII only contains 128 characters.

    • emptyother@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      We got space. Its not like a new language with unique character sets are just gonna pop up any day now. Maybe if we found intelligent aliens.