This isn’t difficult. The Biden campaign is not saying what the OP is claiming they “see a lot of,” he has provided plenty of platform and has seemingly gone out of his way to me minimize mentioning trump (although I expect that the change). The claim that it’s happening a lot is just mindlessly parroting a talking points being fed to them.
Does my comment have to do with your point to be useful? I wasn’t aware I was in the presence of the sole person reaponsible for determining the course of the discussion, it’s an honor to meet you.
It doesn’t have to fall in line to be useful. But I suggest that if you are jumping in to challenge a point you make it clear that your point has nothing to do with the point being made. Most people are going to respond to things considering the context.
The campaign is not reaching me through advertising, but I am reaching the campaign through Google.
Wtf are you even talking about? I’m so confused.
This isn’t difficult. The Biden campaign is not saying what the OP is claiming they “see a lot of,” he has provided plenty of platform and has seemingly gone out of his way to me minimize mentioning trump (although I expect that the change). The claim that it’s happening a lot is just mindlessly parroting a talking points being fed to them.
What don’t you understand about this?
You seem to be under the impression that I agree with the OP…?
So it was just a pointless comment that had nothing to do with the point.
Does my comment have to do with your point to be useful? I wasn’t aware I was in the presence of the sole person reaponsible for determining the course of the discussion, it’s an honor to meet you.
It doesn’t have to fall in line to be useful. But I suggest that if you are jumping in to challenge a point you make it clear that your point has nothing to do with the point being made. Most people are going to respond to things considering the context.
You assumed I was challenging your point. I was simply adding to the discussion.
The glue eating search engine?
Mmmm yummy