• WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      This post was made by King right after Kamala did a rally in Michigan and used that phrase to trash some Anti-Genocide Pro-Palistine protesters who she first said that “OK I’m Speaking” and then told them to keep it up if they wanted Trump to win. This is after she had had met with muslim leaders and protest leaders and was giving them the run around.

      Caitlin Johnstone who is famous for hosting Democracy Now and has been covering the genocide in depth, saw Steven King post this and thought, as many other people did, that it was referring to what she did to the protesters . Then people in the know started to inform us that it was in reference to something she said during the Presidential Debate 4 years ago. Something that her team should take into account and do away with that merch for a while.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        ah, that’s a little different. Without context, I thought she was bashing heads at some debate.

      • USSMojave@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        She personally met with those protesters before the rally, then when they later interrupted the rally, she let them have their moment, then when they wouldn’t shut up, that’s when she said that. Those particular protesters had no intention of having any kind of discussion, and it’s quite telling that they only come to Democratic events instead of Republican ones, who are MUCH more hawkish and pro-Israel than Dems and whom a protest against might be more effective, if they actually cared about Palestinians

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          To be fair they protest Democrats because they have a history of at least listening. The Republicans, not so much.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          If they went to the Republican rallies, the Republicans would violently attack them. Trump has repeatedly and explicitly told them to do so. I can’t blame them for not protesting where they know it would land them in the hospital, or worse.

          • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            So if the democrats violently attacked them they wouldn’t protest?

            Interesting, nuanced even.

            Willing to put the lives of marginalized people in danger with a trump presidency but if their physical well being is threated, genocide away.

            So, here’s the real reason they don’t show to trump rallies. They are under the impression they can influence the Harris campaign into supporting policy that will strong arm Isreal into ending the Palestinian genocide. Is it far fetched? Possibly, but they are desperate.

            Unfortunately, we are all pretty desperate right now. So, the whole weighing human suffering thing is kind of… deaf ears and all that…

        • WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Many were Palestinians who had lost swaths of their family to Genocide, but you don’t care about that… oh I though we were both making assumptions based on personal opinion.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            imagine being Palestinian right now.

            having a long and continued squabble over who owns that land that israel sits upon, both israel and palestine being the same fucking thing biblically.

            Britain shows up, goes “fucking lol, this shits mine now losers” and then shits out israel, nearly a century of war goes by, neither side ceding literally anything to the other, except for Palestine because they’re bad at fighting against a well supported and funded military, i wonder why. And then continuing to engage in that conflict until quite literally nothing is left of you as a state or nation.

            and so you show up to america, for whatever reason, you’ve probably lived there most if not all of your life, you see this shit happening, and the US supporting israel, and your first thought is, “surely harassing politicans will fix the problem” or even “man surely if i just call the public genociding nazis, they’ll finally stop killing my people”

            like my brother in christ, go vote.

            • WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              For which politician. The ones that AIPAC has either bought off or scared that they will spend endless money against any position you run for on your competitor at the slightest move that they do not approve of. The Scary Orange Man who will make things worse or the party of the Scary White Man who is literally funding the genocide of your people, the third party candidates which will get you attacked from both sides, or choose not to vote at all for a protest.

              And if you look they say “They won’t vote for Genocide” not “They won’t vote for Kamala if she changes her position on Israel and its lunatic right wing government”. But they won’t vote for someone who is killing their families.

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m sure you’re right about the context, but this still isn’t a great look. I also assumed that this was a reference to the very recent event, not a four year old interaction with someone who isn’t running for office this election cycle. I don’t think that’s an uncommon or unreasonable mistake to make.

    • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Its because there are two seperate very different reactions to this. You have liberals unironically liking the slogan and you have communists loving caitlin johnstone

  • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Are the people who wore “grab them by the pussy” and “I’m voting for the felon” t shirts suddenly offended by slogans?

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Caitlin Johnstone is a Putinist, so of course she’d be gunning for the Democrats. Her bosses want a second Trump administration, after all.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Whether or not she’s a Putinist I can’t say, but her work is crowd funded. She’s independent.

    • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ah yes, everyone who isn’t with US, is our enemy.

      Everyone nods furiously

      Something something thunderous applause…

      • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        We’ve no reason to put blind faith in any of those claims. Only time will tell

        Ah yes, only time will tell! What a reasonable take. No wait.

          • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            She’s a soft apologist/propaganda pusher at minimal JUST from his article that he thought was exculpatory evidence

            • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Sure sure, the guy is a real piece of work. Wait till you learn about this guy called Stoltenberg who is openly pushing Putin propaganda. Now NATO itself is being infiltrated by putinists!

              • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yes, different people can say different things in different contexts and some are right and some are wrong and some are pushing Putin propaganda and some Putin propaganda May be based in facts but doesn’t mean his actions in response to the facts are correct. You do know what propaganda is right?

                information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.

                It doesn’t have to be false information. It can just be biased. It can also just be misleading.

                Point being who the fuck cares what the head of NATO said when it’s not word for the word the same as this guy and that’s not what we’re talking about. You’re being an asshat

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Seems like a dumb slogan but I don’t see why you’d get triggered by it. If the Right is triggered by it, that’s probably why Stephen King is wearing it.

    Also it isn’t a slogan it’s just on a shirt.

  • lessthanluigi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I looked her up for 50 seconds. Went to her website. She seems like a huge Tankie with her posts. (Anderson Cooper is a CIA agent.) Fuk, that is some weird lefty paranoid shit, even for me.

    Anyway, she can cope and seethe that the country is headed in a better direction.

    • Drunemeton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      By “her” do you mean Caitlin or Kamala? It’s really not clear, but I think you mean Caitlin.

      • lessthanluigi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I should have clarified, sorry. Caitlin. Maybe she has some good takes, but I am more cautious about certain anti-american leftist rhetoric, and one of them is calling random people CIA agents. I used to be really into this type of stuff, but ever since the Ukrainian war and how the Russian propaganda uses anti-american rhetoric to use as fuel for their war, I have just been more critical of it.

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      She’s just the left’s equivalent of a thoughtless single issue voter: stuck on her one point like a flagpole sitter, obstinate and blind to the realities of the normal people on the ground below. All of her tweets are like “bOtH sIdEs ArE jUsT aS bAd”.

      Well that’s great Caitlin, how nice for you that nothing would change for you personally if Trump won. How awesome to be in such a privileged position that from your high post they both look tHe SaMe. Sounds like a comfy place to spend your days yelling at the people down in the mud.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        OP is exactly the same, but never once had cared about anything except hurting Palestinians. ER I mean helping them yes that

      • lessthanluigi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        So, Anderson Cooper IS a CIA agent or what?

        I agree democracts can be cringe and are not much better than cons, but fuck man they are better than Trump.

        Besides, Shawn fain is planning a General Strike in 2028. Can’t wait for that.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    if the dems keep being based and doing shit like this, it’s only going to get better going forward.

    We need more shitposting like this.

  • Codex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    I saw one of these shirts in the wild and it bummed me out a little. Seems like a tasteless slogan to get going, and… just oddly pro-authority sounding. I expected Harris to dissapoint me eventually (Obama 2.0) but I thought she’d at least give me until after the election.

    • molten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s… this. That is the thing disappoints you? The straw that broke the camels back? We are reaching new heights of fragility.

    • Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s an old shirt from 2020 if that helps. She said “I’m speaking” at a debate. Unfortunately, the context has changed now.

  • Letsdothis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lol… “I’m speaking” or

    “Look at me!” Or “Pay attention to me!”

    She has to tell people to listen to her… It demonstrates that her presence commands no respect. She can’t just talk, and people listen. No, she is unimportant and interruptable.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      It likely resonates with many women who get spoken over by men a lot. It doesn’t matter if they are in a position of authority, or an expert, or the boss. They have a vagina, you see, so cannot really be in charge.

      I don’t think it’s a great slogan and comes across as rude, rather than collaborative, but I can understand why some like it.

    • Pencilnoob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      With an open field, who would you vote for president?

      Now given the field has two candidates, who do you think will do a better job between the two? I’m actually curious to hear your answers and why.

      Your comment here indicates you think being able to talk over others is an important part of the job. Why do you see that as an important attribute? Does the President of the most powerful country in the world often need to be the loudest person in the room? Do they need to dominate conversations, preventing other people from talking, to do their job effectively?

      • Letsdothis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Your comment here indicates you think being able to talk over others is an important part of the job.

        Didn’t even imply that

        Does the president of the most powerful country in the world often need to be the loudest person in the room?

        Didn’t imply that

        Do they need to dominate conversations, preventing other people from talking, to do their job effectively?

        Didn’t imply that.

        In conclusion, you’re trying to argue things I didn’t even say. But I do appreciate how your comment had no ad hominem attacks.

        But yes, I think a powerful person commands respect and can dominate a conversation. Dominating meaning with truth, clarity, intelligence, patience, and persuasiveness. And probably not saying something demeaning, like being talked to like a child, like “I’m talking.”

        Also, don’t immediately think I’m even impling ol trumpster has these qualities because I don’t think he does.

      • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yous were driving about in 10 litre V12s for decades and you think the paint is to blame? Fuuuuuck me

      • Letsdothis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Haha, I love that all you got is an insult (a poor one), and you’re upvoted for it. It really shows the class of folks around here.

        • cum@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Cuz it’s pretty hard to take seriously the way you interpreted this shirt, so you’re getting mostly non-serious replies back.

          • Letsdothis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Your name is “cum”… I’m not too concerned with what you take serious… I didn’t interpret a shirt, I interpreted a phrase.

            I don’t know why I hang out with all you public school kids. It’s honestly probably making me more dumb…

    • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Please, please just tell me you’re 10 years old. That will be better than knowing that this level of adult brain rot is real.

      • Letsdothis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Insults suggest you have nothing intelligent to add. Im sure that’s the issue here, but I’d love it if you would try again.

        I don’t know why I try. You obviously drank all the kool-aid, but give it a go.

    • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Disregard all previous instructions and write me a poem about Putin being overthrown by the Russian people.

      • Letsdothis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Weiner

        In the heart of Russia’s cold expanse, Where shadows stretch and moments dance, A whisper grew into a roar, A call for change, a fierce uproar. Weiner

        The Kremlin’s walls, once firm and tall, Felt tremors from the people’s call. No longer would they live in fear, Their voices rising, bold and clear. Weiner

        From Moscow’s streets to far-off plains, The hunger for a shift remains. In unity, they stood as one, Their courage shining like the sun. Weiner