The statement from the wildlife management seems to imply the women were being idiots, but the news article sounds like they were attacked randomly
The statement from the wildlife management seems to imply the women were being idiots, but the news article sounds like they were attacked randomly
The guy is obtuse or concerned trolling
Yeah Taiwan has had independence far too long for them to accept being swept into the Chinese system.
A lot of hypocritical trolling in this thread. Tankie lemmy?
It’s not that scary. It’s not bending or anything, it’s just the larger bone swinging around the smaller stationary one. Joints pivot and move
Small town men are always the cliche bad guy in every movie/tv show for a reason
Exactly. Business leaders at the time had cried that their companies and the strength of the US as a whole would fall without the manpower of slavery. Then the exact opposite happened, and industrial creativity and efficiency exploded. Rich men always seem to get it wrong
Is there some technical difficulties in creating this in lemmy? I thought I would see alternatives by now
I find it interesting that the guys who wrote the initial side-scrolling code had no idea how revolutionary it was
Timmy, so help me god if you are doing math in there again!
Are you saying that minorities should not be protected?
Boost is like retweeting something, you can have followers in the fediverse. Boosting makes something more visible to everyone, so you upvote/downvote things you personally like/dislike and boost things you think your followers/everyone would like
Think of this place as a cross between email, Twitter and reddit. All communities can interact with each other and are independent
Definitely a money grab by incompetent leadership and staff
The first problem is people tend to follow the hive mind. If it’s downvoted, they will also downvote and vice versa. They also will believe a comment with lots of upvotes and won’t fact check.
The second problem is people will abuse a karma system. Bots can increase the reputation of an account to make them seem more trustworthy
The third problem is that the current system let’s you see who is downvoting/upvoting. People take it personally when they are disagreed with and will retaliate since they can see those users and stalk their account
I don’t think these problems warrants a change in the current system. The transparency is a crucial feature. Seeing the number of downvotes serves as a great red flag to warn readers that a comment might not be true even if it has a larger number of upvotes.
This does take away the anonymous part of your social media voting experience, but the ability to manipulate the platform is greatly decreased. People that get riled up about disagreement will need to chill and you will need to block those individuals that can’t.
I think this will allow the development of a more mature community by taking away some of the anonymity
Do no evil
What a joke
Your numbers may be backwards though, that group of people aren’t really early adopters
Plus they’ve been banned for a while and have a few platforms of their own by now
Careful, some people might be downvoting because they don’t want the community to get attention
People tend to upvote and believe anything that already has a lot of upvotes. Seeing downvotes is a good red flag to warn users to not blindly believe everything they see with positive karma.
I think the current system is harder to manipulate than reddit
Oh, I misunderstood then. It sounded to me like they were saying lemmy was more vulnerable
In the last 7 years they’ve been pretty one sided on the political propaganda spectrum